Tag Archives: electromagnetic pulse

US still unprepared for electric armageddon

Originally posted on Newsmax

If you think the coronavirus is frightening, wait until a solar superstorm or electromagnetic pulse (EMP) attack blacks-out the national electric grid, collapses the economy and critical infrastructures for food and water, and 9-of-10 Americans die of starvation.

One year ago, President Trump issued his excellent “Executive Order on Coordinating National Resilience to Electromagnetic Pulses” (March 26, 2019) responding to 20 years of warnings by the EMP Commission that solar superstorms, or manmade EMP from nuclear or non-nuclear weapons, poses an existential threat to the U.S. and to global electronic civilization.

Mandated by the EMP Executive Order is a progress report to President Trump from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Department of Energy (DOE), and other relevant parts of the U.S. Government due to the White House on March 26, 2020.

My newly published book “The Power and the Light: The Congressional EMP Commission’s War To Save America 2001-2020” (www.amazon.com) is my progress report to the American people on implementation of EMP national preparedness:

—Obama-holdovers and Deep State bureaucrats who are EMP non-experts and have long opposed national EMP preparedness for reasons ideological, political, and personal, not least stupidity, are largely in charge of “implementing” President Trump’s EMP Executive Order.

—The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) approved Standard for natural EMP/GMD is merely 8 volts/kilometer, far too low, and should be at least three times higher (24-30 volts/kilometer).

—The EMP Commission recommended EMP/GMD Standard is over ten times higher: 85 volts/kilometer, so the national grid would survive a worst-case solar storm or the long-wavelength threat (E3 EMP) from nuclear EMP attack.

There is still no FERC approved Standard for E1 EMP, the short-wavelength electromagnetic “shockwave” from a nuclear EMP attack that would do the most damage to most electronics. Protection against E1 EMP (50-100 kilovolts/meter) would also mitigate lesser threats from non-nuclear EMP weapons and system-generated over-voltages from cyber-attacks, physical sabotage, and severe weather like hurricanes.

—The deeply erroneous Obama-era EMP report by the Joint Atomic Energy Intelligence Committee (JAEIC) and the more recent so-called “Tri-Labs EMP Report”, both written by a small number of non-experts parroting each other, continue to circulate misinforming U.S. officials and damaging national security. Both reports are highly classified, apparently to protect them from scrutiny and criticism from real EMP experts, while being invoked to prevent mid-level officials (who lack the clearances) from protecting their assets from EMP.

The EMP Commission wrote a classified rebuttal and recommended the recall of these reports, including in letters to Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Dan Coates and DNI Joseph Maguire, which recommendations have been ignored, to the grave harm of our nation.

—The DHS “National EMP Strategy” drafted at the direction of Senator Ron Johnson’s excellent Critical Infrastructure Protection Act underestimates the EMP threat and is deeply flawed.

—Bogus analysis that grossly underestimates natural and nuclear EMP threats by the Electric Power Research Institute, a lobby for the electric power industry masquerading as a think tank, is being funded by DOE and wrongly treated by DHS as analytically sound, even though the EPRI Reports have been critiqued and proven erroneous by the EMP Commission and the USAF Electromagnetic Defense Task Force.

—The rampant incompetence of DHS and DOE is manifest in that they give greater credibility to EPRI non-experts than to the EMP Commission and its Chairman, Dr. William Graham—the foremost EMP expert in the Free World. Chairman Graham also served as President Reagan’s White House Science Advisor, ran NASA, was on the defense science team that discovered the EMP phenomenon, and has been protecting U.S. military systems from EMP since 1963.

—President Trump’s EMP Executive Order responds to the work and recommendations of the EMP Commission, yet U.S. Government implementation of the EMP Executive Order proceeds with almost no involvement or consultation with former EMP Commissioners and staff.

We have seen this movie before, and are living through it now.

20 years ago, in 2001, Operation Dark Winter by the Johns Hopkins Center for Civilian Biodefense Strategies and Center for Strategic and International Studiers simulated a biological attack on the United States, producing an excellent documentary “Dark Winter” about the wargame, that shocked and galvanized Congress to act.

Legislation and resources were invested, recommendations were supposed to have been implemented, to protect U.S. citizens from catastrophic Biological Warfare (BW).

Yet today, the coronavirus, which is chiefly a psychological threat, is having disastrous economic and societal consequences. What happened to BW preparedness?

For the $2 trillion that will be spent on the coronavirus, we could harden all critical infrastructures against EMP; deploy space-based missile defense Brilliant Pebbles before the end of a second term in office by President Trump; modernize the entire U.S. nuclear deterrent from top to bottom (including new missiles, bombers and submarines; new nuclear weapons; and a completely renovated nuclear scientific-industrial base) and have over $1 trillion to spare.

The strategy of pretending to do something, but really doing nothing, and then throwing money at the threat when it happens, will get millions of Americans killed when there is an EMP.

Dr. Peter Vincent Pry is executive director of the Task Force on National and Homeland Security. He served on the Congressional EMP Commission as chief of staff, the Congressional Strategic Posture Commission, the House Armed Services Committee, and the CIA. He is author of “Blackout Wars.” For more of his reports, Go Here Now.

30 Years After Tiananmen: Is Communist China Crushing the Effort to Secure America’s Electric Grid?

Originally published by The Epoch Times:


Today marks the 30th anniversary of the 1989 Chinese regime’s massacre of student-led, peaceful protesters who called for democracy and open government. In 2019, the hand of the Chinese Communist Party reaches into America, where it supports a lobbying organization that downplays threats to America’s electric grid and opposes stronger security standards.

Retired U.S. Army Command Sergeant Major Michael Mabee, a member of the Secure the Grid Coalition, today revealed that the mammoth trade association representing nearly all investor-owned U.S. electric utilities—The Edison Electric Institute (EEI)—includes members that are Chinese state-owned companies. These EEI members have an obligation under Chinese National Intelligence Law to “support, assist and cooperate with the state intelligence work.”

Yesterday, some of the Free World’s foremost experts on the threat of Communist China came together in Washington for a meeting of the “Committee on the Present Danger: China (CPDC)” on the topic “Tiananmen Plus Thirty: The Chinese Communist Party’s Unrestricted Warfare Against Freedom.”

One after another, the CDPC presenters exposed methods by which Communist China is executing the warfighting concept conceived in the late 1990s by two People’s Liberation Army Colonels and published in their book “Unrestricted Warfare.” China expert Roger Robinson referenced a specific passage (p. 191) of the book that postulated a number of critical questions, two of which are immediately applicable to electric grid security:

  • Question 1: “During a war between two countries, during the fighting and killing by two armies, is it necessary to use special means to wage psychological war aimed at soldiers’ families far back in the rear area?”

The Congressional EMP Commission has consistently reported that, indeed, China considers an attack on America’s critical infrastructure a priority.  In its 2017 report titled “Foreign Views of Electromagnetic Pulse Attack,” the Commission pointed out the following writing from Shen Weiguang, a senior Chinese academic military theorist, in his book “The Third World War: Total Information War”:

“As soon as its computer networks come under attack and are destroyed, the country will slip into a state of paralysis and the lives of its people will ground to a halt. Therefore, China should focus on measures to counter computer viruses, nuclear electromagnetic pulse, laser, bunch of particles, and other photoelectric wave weapons and quickly achieve breakthroughs in those technologies in order to equip China without delay with equivalent deterrence that will enable it to stand up to the military powers in the information age and neutralize and check the deterrence of Western powers, including the United States.”

Clearly, the Chinese are interested in protecting their own critical infrastructure and networks against cyber and electromagnetic (EMP) attack so it seems fitting for the United States to seek to do the same.  This leads to the second of the many troubling questions cited in Unrestricted Warfare:

  • Question 2: “Can special funds be set up to exert greater influence on another country’s government and legislature through lobbying?”

If China wanted to influence the United States to under-protect American critical infrastructure, gaining access to EEI would be one effective way of doing this. In 2018, EEI expended $8,109,166 on lobbying, which is supported through its membership dues and is conducted before the U.S. Congress and also the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the government agency that approves electric grid security standards.

Interestingly, EEI’s lobbying activities have included opposing stronger cybersecurity protections for grid infrastructure. In its corporate communications, EEI has downplayed the threat of electromagnetic pulse (EMP). EEI recently argued that the names of companies who violate federal Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP) standards should be withheld from public scrutiny.

Sergeant Major Mabee rightly points out that EEI’s lobbying could benefit the Chinese Communist regime. Chinese agents have already infiltrated the U.S. electric grid, according to disclosures by senior U.S. officials.

The executives and U.S. utility members of EEI should take a close look at the book “Unrestricted Warfare” and then reexamine their membership policy for companies beholden to foreign intelligence services. EEI’s activities should fall on the side of freedom, not pave the way for Communist China to take down America’s electric grid, and with it—our nation.

Tommy Waller is vice president for special projects at the Center for Security Policy. In that capacity, he has been involved in a project called The Secure the Grid Coalition.

Views expressed in this article are the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.

“Not Today Sir”: Trump Builds U.S. Strategic Defenses Reagan Style, EMP-Proofing America

“Not Today Sir” PDF

U.S. Air Force Brigadier General James R. McCarthy (Ret.) [1]commanded a wing of Strategic Air Command (SAC) B-52s during the height of the Cold War that kept American nuclear weapons airborne, encircling Russia twenty-four hours per day — for decades. The B-52s comprised one leg of America’s “nuclear triad” of bombers, submarines, and missile silos that relentlessly maintained around-the-clock deterrence against a Soviet preemptive nuclear attack on the United States.

That attack could come unannounced at any moment if America should let down her guard.

General McCarthy of the Strategic Air Command recalled in a documentary: [2]

There was a story that used to be told. There was a general and he would go to the Russian premier and the question was “Is today the day we can take on the United States and we can come out ahead?” The general would say “not today sir.” And our job [at SAC] was to make sure that every day that was his answer.

U.S. Air Force B-52s carrying nuclear weapons patrolled at high altitude near the Soviet Union’s borders 24 hours per day for years in order to maintain deterrence against a Soviet first strike.

President Trump’s job is to make certain the latest generation of Russian generals have no choice other than to provide that very same answer to current Russian President Vladimir Putin: “Not today sir.”

That job is easier said than done.

President Trump Announced Major Defense Initiatives Designed To Help The U.S. Face Off Against Russia And China And Their Respective Proxies Such As Iran And North Korea

President Obama handed off to President Trump a national security apparatus left in tatters.

President Trump is the first president since President Ronald Reagan who not only believes in, but is acting upon, Reagan’s words: [3]  “If we can protect America with a defensive shield from incoming missile attacks, we should by all means do so.”

To protect America from Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea, President Trump reversedBarack Obama’s policies [4]that had only served, strengthened, and emboldened America’s adversaries.

President Donald Trump stated: [5]

Our goal is simple: to ensure that we can detect and destroy any missile launched against the United States anywhere, any time, any place . . . When it comes to defending America, we will not take any chances. We will only take action. There is no substitute for American military might.

In order to achieve that goal, President Trump has:

    • Spearheaded a massive rebuilding of the U.S. Navy’s fleet of destroyers, [6]aircraft carriers, [7]and attack submarines. [8]
    • Established a new office to oversee acquisition of the Navy’s new Columbia Class ballistic missile submarines, “the key to the nation’s nuclear triad.” [9]
    • Reactivated the U.S. Navy 2nd Fleet [10](deactivated by President Obama in 2011 [11]) to patrol the North Atlantic and to challenge Russia.
    • Established, with his Army Chief of Staff General Mark Milley, a new Four Star Army Command called Futures Command [12]to develop advanced weapon technologies that can challenge Russia and China in the wake of President Barack Obama’s [13]cancellation [14]of Future Combat Systems.
    • Issued an executive order [15]preparing the U.S. to counter, react, and respond to a nuclear electromagnetic pulse (EMP) attack.
    • Announced [16]a new “Star Wars” missile defense [17]system even more advanced than the system envisioned by Ronald Reagan.
    • Established a sixth branch of the armed forces: the U.S. Space Force. [18]
    • Ordered [19]the establishment of U.S. Space Command (USSPACECOM) in December 2018.
    • Appointed the architect [20]of Reagan’s “Star Wars” SDI program to direct the Pentagon’s advanced technology programs and to restart “Star Wars” — a highly effective and symbolic move.
    • Withdrew [21]the United States from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty on which Russia was cheating.
    • Signed [22]the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for 2019 that includes the Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act (FIRRMA), expanding the definition of a Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) “covered transaction” to include “The purchase or lease by foreign persons of certain U.S. real estate near a U.S. port, military facility, or other “sensitive” government property.” This new law enhances the President’s pre-existing executive powers to block foreign adversaries from purchasing or leasing facilities at U.S. seaports near U.S. military bases.
    • Withdrew [23]the United States from the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty (ATT), [24]thus preserving the Second Amendment rights of the American people. President Obama had signed [25]away those rights in 2014, ceding American sovereignty to an unelected global bureaucracy.


Russia’s And China’s Long-Range Communist Plan

According to Soviet KGB defector Major Anatoliy Golitsyn, the Russians and the Chinese secretly cooperated as a team against the United States. The two communist powers staged a fake adversarial relationship known as the “Sino-Soviet Deception,” duping the West for decades as they secretly coordinated plans to destroy it.

According to Golitsyn’s book The Perestroika Deception, [26]the Soviets faked the “fall of communism” in preparation for the final war against the West.

Major Golitsyn revealed to CIA Counterintelligence Chief James Angleton the KGB’s planned “special maneuver” known as “The Perestroika Deception” in pursuit of worldwide victory for communism. Under this “special maneuver,” the Soviets trick the West into believing that the Cold War is over. According to the KGB plan, the West then naively lets down its guard; this is exactly what has happened, allowing Russia to gain sufficient strategic military advantage to eventually force the West to merge into worldwide communism.

Major Golitsyn, who worked inside the KGB’s strategic planning department, opens his book The Perestroika Deception[27]with a quote by ancient Chinese military strategist Sun Tzu: 

All warfare is based on deception. Therefore, when capable, feign incapacity; when active, inactivity. When near, make it appear that you are far away; when far away, that you are near.

Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Senator James Inhofe (R-OK) recently warned that China’s military buildup suggests that the rising communist superpower is “preparing for World War III.”[28]

The “Wall Street Journal” reported [29]on the “Bolshevik plague,” stating that, over the last 100 years, communism has killed 100 million people. Yet, in an appalling admission, Vladimir Putin exposed his authoritarian tendencies when he declared [30]“I was not, as you know, a party member by necessity . . . I liked Communist and socialist ideas very much and I like them still.”

President Trump’s Favorite General Mark Milley “Leads The Way”

President Trump nominated U.S. Army Chief of Staff General Mark A. Milley to become the next Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

Russia “is the only country on Earth that has the capability to destroy us in terms of nuclear capability,” declared U. S. Army Chief of Staff Four-Star General Mark A. Milley. “It’s fundamental to maintain military strength to live in peace. If you don’t maintain that strength, you put yourself at risk.”[31]

“Politico” calls [32]General Milley “Trump’s new favorite general.”

President Trump nominated General Milley to become the next Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. [33]

“‘The faint clouds of a coming storm are visible on the horizon,’” [Milley] said, with Russia and China bolstering their militaries and looking to expand their economic influence, the “Army Times” reported. [34]

According to “The Washington Post,” General Milley stated: [35]

As America, we have no luxury of a single opponent. We have to be able to fight guerrillas and terrorists all the way up through nation-state militaries. If we do not maintain our commitment to remain strong in the air, on the sea and yes, on the ground, then we will pay the butcher’s bill in blood, and we will forever lose the precious gift of our freedom.

The role of the U.S. military’s nuclear triad as a deterrent against a Russian preemptive nuclear attack is as critical today as it ever was during the Cold War — a knife’s edge war which never really ended, according to Golitsyn’s book New Lies For Old. [36]

The Winds Of War, Gulftainer, Gulftainer’s Connections to Russia, And Pacepa’s Warning

PORT CANAVERAL, FL – Launch from Kennedy Space Center, ten miles north of the Port Canaveral. Three cruise ships are docked at passenger terminals.

The winds of war were already blowing when President Obama gave the enemy a military advantage as ancient as war itself — one of America’s most strategically critical ports.

Sun Tzu’s maxim championing the application of tactical deception to get near one’s enemy evokes the joint venture [37]between Russian Technologies (ROSTEC), the exporter of Russia’s Club-K Container Missile System, and Middle Eastern-based cargo container terminal operator Gulftainer. [38]

Headquartered in the United Arab Emirates, Gulftainer manages ports throughout the Middle East and beyond. Gulftainer operates in Brazil, Iraq, Lebanon, Pakistan, Russia, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia.

The joint venture company between Gulftainer and ROSTEC is officially known as Gulftainer Russian Technologies.

Gulftainer’s Iraqi co-owner Hamid Dhia Jafar is the brother and business partner of Saddam Hussein’s rogue nuclear physicist Dr. Jafar Dhia Jafar. [39]

Dr. Jafar created Saddam’s “Arab Bomb,” a miniaturized nuclear warhead known as the Iraqi “Beach Ball.”  The U.S. government investigated both Iraqi Jafar brothers for their connections to illicit Iraqi WMDs, yet, astoundingly, the Obama administration allowed them “inside the wire” at Port Canaveral. [40]

Port Canaveral, Florida is critical military infrastructure that supports key national security missions of U.S. Naval submarine warfare, Naval Sea Systems Command (submarine acoustics research), the National Reconnaissance Office and the Central Intelligence Agency (satellite launches), U.S. Air Force Space Command, U.S. Military Sealift Command, and NASA.

The U.S. military tests ballistic missiles over the Eastern Range [41]rocket test range from launch heads adjacent to Port Canaveral at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station and Kennedy Space Center. U.S. Naval Facility Port Canaveral oversees Trident II D5 submarine launched ballistic missile tests over the Eastern Range.

In the tradition of Sun-Tzu, Gulftainer’s Iraqi co-owner Hamid Dhia Jafar used his Middle-Eastern ports management company Gulftainer, which had not only partnered with Russia’s state-owned military-industrial complex conglomerate ROSTEC, but also with ROSTEC’s finance subsidiary PROMINVEST, to essentially set up a foreign base “inside the wire” at Florida’s Port Canaveral.

ROSTEC, through its wholly-owned subsidiary ROSOBORONEXPORT, [42]exports battle-ready Trojan Horse Club-K missile launching systems, disguised as standard intermodal cargo containers, to Russian proxy regimes such as Iran. ROSTEC also manufactures Club-K Container Missile System [43]components.

And that is just the tip of the iceberg.

The Pentagon placed Soviet-trained Dr. Jafar Dhia Jafar, who served as Saddam’s Deputy Defense Minister, on U.S. Central Command’s (CENTCOM’s) Operation Iraqi Freedom “Blacklist[44]as a legitimate military target wanted for capture or kill.

The Treasury Department and three congressional committees investigated [45]Hamid Dhia Jafar for his “Oil-For-Superweapons” scheme concocted to fund Saddam’s and       Dr. Jafar Dhia Jafar’s biological, chemical, and nuclear WMD programs.

The Iraqi Jafar brothers enjoy a long-term and close relationship with Russia’s state-owned military-industrial complex and with many of the former KGB officials from Putin’s inner circle that oversee it, including ROSTEC CEO Sergey Chemenov [46]and ROSNEFT CEO Igor Sechin. It is less than comforting that Sechin has been described as Russia’s ‘Darth Vader’ [47]and “the scariest person on earth.” [48]

Of particular interest is that, prior to the troublesome “Project Pelican” deal, Gulftainer entered into its joint venture [49]with Russia’s ROSTEC. The disturbing joint venture with the Russian weapons exporter was set up in advance of Port Canaveral awarding Gulftainer the 35-year cargo container terminal lease. These associations are another red flag that should have set off alarm bells within the U.S. intelligence community.

Igor Sechin with Gulftainer co-owner Hamid Dhia Jafar (image on left), Vladimir Putin with Hamid Dhia Jafar’s son Badr Jafar, Chairman of the Executive Board of Gulftainer (image on right)

Gulftainer affiliate Crescent Investments entered into another Russian alliance through a strategic cooperation agreement[50]with Inter RAO UES, a subsidiary of Uranium One [51]purchaser ROSATOM.

Russia’s military industrial complex is a revolving-door industry where “retired” KGB agents are moved through the executive suites of Russia’s state-owned military, nuclear, and weapons enterprises like a game of musical chairs.

Which begs the question:  Do the Iraqi Jafar brothers work for Russia?

The Obama administration’s actions benefited Gulftainer and its Russian joint-venture partner ROSTEC and allowed designated enemies inside a U.S. critical military infrastructure port.

Russia’s lethal Club-K container missile launchers deceptively maintain the appearance of standard intermodal cargo containers, indistinguishable from millions of containers transiting each year through America’s highways, ports, and railways.

These Club-K Trojan Horse dummy “cargo containers” can conceal Russian Kalibr supersonic cruise missile launchers capable of delivering biological, chemical, conventional, EMP, and nuclear payloads.

Dr. Peter Pry told [52]the “Washington Examiner”:

Iran has demonstrated the capability to launch a missile off a freighter. Iran has also purchased Russia’s Club-K missile system. The Club-K is a complete missile launch system, disguised to look like a shipping container, that could convert any freighter into a missile launch platform. The Club-K, if armed with a nuclear warhead, could be used to execute an EMP attack.

Russia’s Club-K Container Missile System can launch Russian Kalibr Cruise Missiles from ships, trucks, and trains to deliver biological, chemical, conventional, EMP, and nuclear payloads.

The Club-K gives “any merchant vessel the capability to wipe out an aircraft carrier” according to Reuters. [53]“It’s a carrier-killer,” Robert Hewson of Jane‘s Defense Weekly told Reuters. “If you are hit by one or two of them, the kinetic impact is vast…it’s horrendous.”

Gulftainer’s Disturbing Affinity For U.S. Navy Ballistic Missile Submarine Bases

ATLANTIC OCEAN, KINGS BAY GA (FEBRUARY 6, 2013) Ohio-class ballistic missile submarine USS Tennessee (SSBN 734) returns to Naval Submarine Base Kings Bay (left). ATLANTIC OCEAN, CAPE CANAVERAL FL (DECEMBER 4, 1989) A Trident II D-5 intercontinental ballistic missile lifts off from the water after being test launched from the submerged USS Tennessee (SSBN-734) at Cape Canaveral, Florida (right). (U.S. Navy photos)

Gulftainer presents a critical security risk for the U.S. Navy ballistic missile submarines known as “boomers.”  These submarines comprise one leg of America’s nuclear triad and its most survivable leg. Accordingly, the boomers are America’s last line of defense.

Gulftainer has an alarming affinity for U.S. Navy ballistic missile submarine bases.

In the tradition of Sun Tzu, Gulftainer twice tried to position itself “inside the wire” next to U.S. Navy submarines.

Before Gulftainer gained access to Port Canaveral through the secret “Project Pelican” deal, Gulftainer quietly attempted, but failed, to “take over” Florida’s Port of Jacksonville with a proposed $250 million payment in exchange for becoming the port’s “silent partner.” The Port of Jacksonville is located near Naval Submarine Base Kings Bay along the Georgia-Florida state line. Naval Submarine Base Kings Bay is the largest U.S. Navy ballistic missile submarine base on the East Coast.

On its second attempt, Gulftainer succeeded getting close to the boomers at Port Canaveral.

The joint venture [54]between Russia’s ROSTEC/ROSOBORONEXPORT and Iraqi and Iranian-connected Gulftainer, coupled with Gulftainer’s 35-year lease at Port Canaveral, is a Russian strategic military force multiplier.
Map of Port Canaveral, Florida

Nuclear Triad At Risk

During a surprise attack against the United States, China, Iran, North Korea, and Russia could not only attempt to bring down the national power grid with Super-EMP weapons — they could also target America’s nuclear triad.

The nuclear triad serves as “the backbone of America’s national security.” [55]

Adversaries could attempt to destroy the triad’s nuclear missile silos, submarine bases, and strategic bomber air bases.

Dr. Peter Vincent Pry warned [56]in an April 12, 2019 article at “The Hill” titled “Add two more legs to our nuclear triad, or we’ll lose the next war”:

Submarines are the most survivable leg of the Triad, ensuring a U.S. retaliatory capability, even if bombers and ICBMs are destroyed . . .

. . . The number of U.S. ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs) has been reduced from 35-45 during the Cold War to 14 today, falling to 12 Columbia SSBNs in the future. Since only one-third of SSBNs usually are on patrol, and up to two-thirds often at port, eight of the 12 planned Columbias could be destroyed in port, leaving only four surviving at sea in a surprise attack.

Dr. Pry’s analysis of the U.S. nuclear triad suggests that Kings Bay and Port Canaveral are military targets of Russia’s Pearl Harbor 2.0 asymmetric war plans [57]that these authors uncovered from a Russian defense journal.

Image: Club-K Container Missile System marketing material from Russian Federation state-owned weapons exporter ROSOBORONEXPORT.

Russia’s Pearl Harbor 2.0 Asymmetrical War Plans, Gulftainer, Club-K, and EMP

Port Canaveral is also a high-value target for U.S. adversaries because of its location at the nexus of America’s space and ballistic missile testing programs.

“Politico” reported in a 2018 article titled “Space war is coming — and the U.S. is not ready”: [58]

A 2001 report issued by then-Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld warned that an attack on space systems during a conflict “should not be considered an improbable act.”

“If the U.S. is to avoid a ‘Space Pearl Harbor,’ it needs to take seriously the possibility of an attack on the U.S. space system,” the report said.

“Space is a domain and conflicts with Russia and China will evoke attacks in, of, and through space” Senator Inhofe, Chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, stated during his opening remarks at the April 11, 2019 “Proposal for a U.S. Space Force” hearing. [59][60]“This will profoundly disrupt our society…”

President Obama ignored America’s strategic need for a Space Force and cancelled the 2020 manned moon mission program. Instead, President Obama directed NASA Administrator Charles Bolden to transform NASA’s civilian mission into a “Muslim outreach[61]undertaking.

President Trump, however, challenged Russia and China head-on by establishing the U.S. Space Force.

Pacepa’s Warning

“On all these issues, but particularly missile defense, this can be solved, but it is important for him to give me space. This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.” — President Barack Obama 

Former Romanian Foreign Intelligence Service Chief General Ion Mihai Pacepa, the former Eastern Block’s highest-ranking defector and a longtime U.S. intelligence asset, recently stated that President Obama consistently capitulated to Russia and appeared to have some intelligence connections to the Kremlin.

In his February 2018 “PJ Media” essay, Pacepa noted about President Obama: [62]

“I will negotiate with Russia to take our ICBMs off hair-trigger alert and to achieve deep cuts in our nuclear arsenal,” Obama told the country on February 18, 2008, when he announced his foreign policy as future U.S. president. “I will cut investments in unproven missile defense systems. I will not weaponize space. I will slow down our development of future combat systems.”

In a private message for Vladimir Putin, picked up by an inadvertently hot microphone, Obama — now president — was more explicit. He told Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev: “On all these issues, but particularly missile defense, this can be solved, but it is important for him to give me space.”

“This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility” Obama continued. “I understand” replied Medvedev. “I will transmit this information to Vladimir [Putin].” [63][64]

Pacepa forged ahead:

To a knowledgeable eye, Obama’s actions suggest he might have had some intelligence connection with the Kremlin, such as Whittaker Chambers once had. In 2010, the FBI arrested ten Russian intelligence officers documented as native-born Americans who were serving as spies in the United States. President Obama then returned them to Russia before they were interrogated by the FBI about their spying tasks.

It is stunning that a former KGB agent, defector, and longtime U.S. intelligence asset called out a former U.S. president as a spy working for Russia: yes, that Russia, “the only country on Earth that has the capability to destroy us in terms of nuclear capability” in the words of General Milley.

Barack Obama’s Legacy

President Obama’s legacy is dominated by his lengthy catalogue of reckless capitulations to America’s adversaries.

President Obama:

    • Signed the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (New START) [65]with the Russian Federation. During a phone call with Vladimir Putin, President Trump denounced New START as “one of several bad deals negotiated by the Obama administration.” [66]
    • Scrapped proposed missile defense shield installations in Poland and the Czech Republic designed to protect Europe from Iranian intercontinental ballistic missiles. [67]
    • Retired the U.S. Navy’s nuclear Tomahawk land-attack cruise missiles. [68]
    • Quarterbacked, through his lead negotiator Wendy Sherman (a founder of the Albright Stonebridge Group), the JCPOA (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action) “Iran nuclear deal” that furthered and funded Iran’s nuclear program.
    • Failed to stop the sale of Uranium One to ROSATOM, a deal that transferred control of 20 percent of a U.S. uranium reserves, a national security asset, to Russia.
    • Initiated the “Russian Reset” that facilitated the technology transfers that are key to U.S. military application, through “Moscow’s Silicon Valley” Skolkovo, leading to Russia’s development of hypersonic missiles.
    • Had federal agencies allow Port Canaveral to enter into its “Project Pelican” lease agreement with Iraqi WMD-linked Gulftainer and pave the way for Gulftainer’s second U.S. deal at Delaware’s Port of Wilmington [69]through a Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER) grant. [70]
    • Purged senior U.S. military flag officers in staggering numbers, including the number two officer at U.S. Strategic Command and a two-star Air Force general who oversaw 450 ICBM silos, key command and control positions within America’s nuclear triad. [71]

Based upon former President Obama’s legacy of destruction, one could easily believe that Pacepa’s suggestion that Barack Obama “might have had some intelligence connection with the Kremlin” is true.

President Obama and Vice President Biden Paved the Way for Gulftainer to Take Over Delaware’s Port of Wilmington

(PORT OF WILMINGTON, DELAWARE — JULY 17, 2014) President Obama signs an executive memorandum creating the “Build America Investment Initiative” “to use innovative financing and partnerships with the private sector to support transportation infrastructure.” (Image: WhiteHouse.gov)

President Obama visited Delaware’s Port of Wilmington in July 2014, one month after Gulftainer and Port Canaveral unveiled their secretly-negotiated Project Pelican deal. From his podium on the Port of Wilmington wharf, President Obama remarked: [72]

Treasury Secretary Jack Lew is here. . .

. . . And thanks to a competitive grant program called TIGER — a program, by the way, that was part of the Recovery Act that we initiated when I first came into office and Joe Biden helped to manage — this port is rebuilding a wharf that will finally let Wilmington compete with other ports for the biggest cargo ships.  (Applause.) For the biggest cargo ships.

One week before Gulftainer and Port Canaveral signed the Project Pelican deal, Treasury Secretary Jacob ‘Jack’ Lew flew over to the UAE to discuss foreign investment in the United States. [73]

Foremost EMP Expert Dr. Peter Pry Weighs In On MAD

MAD is an acronym for the decades-old, suicidal policy known as Mutually Assured Destruction.

President John F. Kennedy’s administration introduced [74]the American public to the MAD concept — a strategic military theory that maintains a Soviet nuclear first strike can be deterred by American capability to respond with an overwhelming counterstrike.

Nuclear strategist Albert Wohlstetter famously characterized MAD as a “delicate balance of terror.” [75]

Since the days of President Kennedy, nuclear proliferation has allowed rogue third-world regimes access to nuclear weapons and, more recently, to civilization-killing super-EMP weapons and the means to deliver them even at great distance.

Under MAD policy, rogue states and failing communist economies could achieve parity with the most successful nations of Western Civilization — especially the United States — by blackmailing Western nations into giving into any and all demands under the threat of the use of these weapons.

Significant movement toward parity was reached during Chinagate [76]when, “as president, Bill Clinton [77]essentially wiped out any strategic advantage the United States held by selling advanced U.S. missile technology to our enemy, the People’s Republic of China,” according to “FrontPage Magazine.” [78]

Further movement toward parity came when President Bill Clinton [79]and Wendy Sherman, the former social worker who became the right-hand deputy to Secretary Madeleine Albright (Secretary Albright was formerly known as Marie Jana Korbelová of Czechoslovakia),gave North Korea billions of dollars to construct nuclear reactors in 1994.

Further down the path toward parity, President Barack Obama, again with Wendy Sherman, gave Iran $1.7 billion [80]in Swiss Francs, euros, and other foreign currencies as they negotiated the Iran nuclear deal.

“Iran may have received an additional $33.6 billion in secret cash and gold payments facilitated by the Obama administration between 2014 and 2016, according to testimony provided before Congress by an expert on last summer’s nuclear agreement with Iran,” the “Washington Free Beacon” reported in 2016. [81]

Now these rogue states are developing Super-EMP weapons.

“One nuclear warhead detonated at high-altitude over the United States would blackout the national electric grid and other life sustaining critical infrastructures for months or years by means of an electromagnetic pulse (EMP),” Dr. Peter Pry wrote in 2015 at Israel’s “Arutz Sheva.” [82]“A nationwide blackout lasting one year, according to the Congressional EMP Commission, could cause chaos and starvation that leaves 90 percent of Americans dead.”

“In a worst-case [EMP attack] scenario, all [nuclear power] reactors within an affected region could be impacted simultaneously,” a 2018 U.S. Air Force Air University Electromagnetic Defense Task Force report warns. [83]“In the United States, this would risk meltdowns at approximately 60 sites and 99 nuclear reactors,” exponentially exceeding the scale of the Chernobyl and Fukushima disasters.

Russia, China, or rogue “Axis of Evil” proxy states such as Iran and North Korea could carry out a nuclear EMP attack against the United States by coupling these weapons to a Trojan Horse delivery vehicle that can be positioned offshore, inside the border, or in space directly above, the United States.

North Korean satellites, Russian Club-K Container Missile Systems (aboard container ships, trains, and trucks), and Iranian and North Korean ships off the U.S. coast are potential launch points for such a surprise nuclear EMP attack on the United States. [84]

EMP Commission Chairman Dr. William Graham warned in 2017: [85]

An EMP attack could be made by a North Korean satellite. The design of an EMP or even a super-EMP weapon could be relatively small and lightweight. Such a device could fit inside North Korea’s Kwangmyongsong-3 (KMS-3) and Kwangmyongsong-4 (KMS-4) satellites that presently orbit the Earth. The south polar trajectory of KMS-3 and KMS-4 evades U.S. Ballistic Missile Early Warning Radars and National Missile Defenses, resembling a Russian secret weapon developed during the Cold War, called the Fractional Orbital Bombardment System (FOBS) that would have used a nuclear-armed satellite to make a surprise EMP attack on the United States.

President Reagan, a visionary leader who believed America was capable of defending herself from communist nuclear blackmail, attempted to build the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) to free America from MAD.

The Democratic Party opposition, however, has consistently succeeded in leaving the United States unable to sufficiently detect, track, and neutralize incoming ballistic and cruise missiles.

President Clinton, Clinton’s Secretary of Defense Les Aspin, and Clinton’s Assistant Secretary of Defense Ash Carter, killed President Reagan’s “Star Wars” SDI program in 1993. [86]

Ash Carter publicly criticized another promising high-tech missile defense concept called “Brilliant Pebbles.” [87]

President Clinton’s, Les Aspin’s, and Ash Carter’s opposition to missile defense and embrace of MAD policies left America in a “suicide pact” with certifiably bloodthirsty enemies.

President Obama carried forward President Clinton’s objective to leave the United States defenseless and further advanced Russian interests by bringing back Ash Carter for that purpose, eventually appointing Carter as Secretary of Defense. [88]

President Trump is reversing, and blunting the impact of, the MAD policies of Clinton and Obama. President Trump is standing up to Russia’s nuclear terror of MAD and is protecting America and her people from nuclear attacks and the “civilization killer” Super-EMP.

The crumbling national security foundation that President Obama left behind was the result of Obama’s rapid acceleration of MAD policy under which both North Korea and Iran were quickly approaching having the capability to launch nuclear EMP first strikes on the United States.

Once elected, President Obama did not simply slow development of the Future Combat Systems initiative, the first modernization of U.S. Army combat systems since World War II. Instead, President Obama cancelled the Future Combat Systems program in its entirety. [89]

‍Dr. Peter Pry, in an exclusive interview with Mary Fanning in July 2018, stated:

President Clinton’s Secretary of Defense Les Aspin, when he boasted he “Took the stars out of Star Wars,” was terminating Ronald Reagan’s Strategic Defense Initiative that envisioned space-based missile defenses that would render nuclear missiles obsolete.

Tragically, as Ambassador Henry Cooper (former SDI Director) has written, the Clinton Administration killed the opportunity to deploy Brilliant Pebbles — space-based defenses that were then ready for deployment — leaving America naked to the nuclear missile threats we face today from Russia, China, North Korea, [90]and Iran (this last soon, if not now).

Why did Clinton and Les Aspin and Ash Carter kill SDI and Brilliant Pebbles? [91]Democrats and the Left long regarded the ABM Treaty [Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty (1972-2002)] as the “cornerstone of strategic stability” because they believed in the policy of Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD).  Space-based defenses that could defend the American people from large-scale nuclear missile threats would cancel the mutual vulnerability at the basis of MAD. Deployment of space-based defenses, or of any missile defenses capable of defending America from large-scale nuclear missile attacks, would require U.S. withdrawal from the ABM Treaty limiting such defenses.  In short, the Clinton Administration killed SDI and Brilliant Pebbles because they saw these as threats to the ABM Treaty and MAD, the fake “cornerstone of strategic stability.”

Peace Through Strength

President Obama’s Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter had, in 1984, written a background report that was extremely critical of President Reagan’s “Star Wars” Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI). Years later, Ash Carter crowed that the anti-SDI paper he had authored was “the first authoritative report to say that the emperor has no clothes.”[92]

In 1986, two years following the publication of Ash Carter’s anti-SDI report, the Heritage Foundation, in an article titled “While Opposing Reagan’s SDI Moscow Pushes Its Own Star Wars,” reported: [93]

At the Iceland summit with Soviet General Secretary Mikhail Gorbachev, Ronald Reagan chose not to trade away the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) for a reduction of nuclear arms that, while substantial, would still leave the U.S. vulnerable to nuclear attack.

A major reason for Reagan’s decision not to give up SDI is the knowledge that the Soviet Union has been working on its own strategic defense program for years. Moscow, in fact, deploys the only operational anti-ballistic missile (ABM) system in the world. Since 1970 it has spent roughly $80 billion [$184 billion in 2019 dollars] more than the U.S. on building strategic defenses against ballistic missiles, bombers, and cruise missiles, and today spends ten times more than the U.S. on strategic ground-based lasers capable of interfering with low-altitude U.S. satellites.

President Ronald Reagan said during his 1981 commencement address at the U.S. Military Academy in West Point, New York: [94]

A Chinese philosopher, Sun Tzu, 2,500 years ago said winning a hundred victories in a hundred battles is not the acme of skill; to subdue the enemy without fighting is the acme of skill. A truly successful army is one that, because of its strength and ability and dedication, will not be called upon to fight because no one will dare to provoke it.

There have been four wars in my lifetime; none of them came about because the United States was too strong. At the end of World War II, we alone were at the peak of our military strength, our great industrial capacity was untouched by war’s destruction, and it was then that – in those dark days – that Pope Pius XII said, ”America has a great genius for great and unselfish deeds. Into the hands of America God has placed an afflicted mankind.”

Not since President Reagan has a U.S. President put America’s national security and Americans first.

President Donald Trump should be lauded for taking the first step in a very long time toward securing the United States of America and working to protect every American’s life from a Western civilization-killing Super-EMP attack. [95]

President Trump has embraced President Reagan’s “Peace through Strength” policy.

Anyone who grew up on the playground understands that capitulation never gained them security.

As long as President Trump continues to build up U.S. strategic defenses [96]in service to President Reagan’s “Peace Through Strength” doctrine, America’s answer to Vladimir Putin’s aggression will remain, “not today sir.”

© Mary Fanning and Alan Jones 2019

[1]BRIGADIER GENERAL JAMES R. MCCARTHY biography, United States Air Force, https://www.af.mil/About-Us/Biographies/Display/Article/106309/brigadier-general-james-r-mccarthy/

[2]“B-52: STRATOFORTRESS,” BATTLE STATIONS, 2002, Written and Directed by Colin Barratt, Produced by Flashback Television for the History Channel,  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MuB7mK7b-2o&t=344s

[3]Associated Press, “Reagan Attacks Clinton Over Plan to Kill ‘Star Wars’ Program,” Los Angeles Times, May 16, 1993, https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1993-05-16-mn-36216-story.html

[4]“Candidate Barack Obama on Missile Defense (Circa 2008), Missile Defense Advocacy Alliance, January 17, 2017, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xD0Ln_6XBCk

[5]“Remarks by President Trump and Vice President Pence Announcing the Missile Defense Review,” The White House, January 17, 2019, https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-trump-vice-president-pence-announcing-missile-defense-review/

[6]Kris Osborn “Navy to add 30 destroyers in massive warship expansion,” Fox News, April 1 2019, https://www.foxnews.com/tech/navy-to-add-30-destroyers-in-massive-warship-expansion

[7]Kris Osborn “Navy eyes more, deadlier, aircraft carriers,” Fox News, March 22, 2019, https://www.foxnews.com/tech/navy-eyes-more-deadlier-aircraft-carriers

[8]Neil Vigdor, “Trump adds third submarine to Pentagon spending request, a potential boon for Electric Boat and southeastern Connecticut,” Hartford Courant, March 11, 2019, https://www.courant.com/politics/hc-pol-sub-production-trump-20190311-3tb7fvr64zbi3p3ckjfdfrz2x4-story.html

[9]Paul McLeary “Navy Stands Up Columbia Submarine Office, Key To Nuclear Triad,” Breaking Defense, March 06, 2019, https://breakingdefense.com/2019/03/navy-stands-up-columbia-submarine-office-key-to-nuclear-triad/

[10]Christopher Woody, “Tensions between NATO and Russia are rising, and now the US is reactivating a fleet to patrol the Atlantic,” Business Insider, May 4, 2018 https://www.businessinsider.com/us-navy-reactivating-2nd-fleet-for-atlantic-amid-tensions-with-russia-2018-5

[11]Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class (SW/AW) Rafael Martie, “US 2nd Fleet Disestablishes, Merges with Fleet Forces Command,” Navy News Service, September 30, 2011, https://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=63027

[12]Jen Judson, “Can Austin make the Army weird?”DefenseNews, August 28, 2018, https://www.defensenews.com/land/2018/08/28/can-austin-make-the-army-weird/

[13]“Candidate Barack Obama on Missile Defense (Circa 2008), Missile Defense Advocacy Alliance, January 17, 2017, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xD0Ln_6XBCk

[14]DoDBuzz, “It’s Official: FCS Cancelled,” Military.com, June 23, 2009, https://www.military.com/dodbuzz/2009/06/23/its-official-fcs-cancelled

[15]President Donald J. Trump, “Executive Order on Coordinating National Resilience to Electromagnetic Pulses,” The White House, March 26, 2019, https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-coordinating-national-resilience-electromagnetic-pulses/

[16]President Donald J. Trump, “Trump speaks at the Missile Defense Review,” Fox News, streamed live on January 17, 2019, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YzSKnxEHb3g

[17]Office of the Secretary of Defense, “2019 Missile Defense Review,” U.S. Department of Defense, January 19, 2019, https://www.defense.gov/Portals/1/Interactive/2018/11-2019-Missile-Defense-Review/The%202019%20MDR_Executive%20Summary.pdf

[18]Mike Stone and Jeff Mason, “Trump signs directive in step to create U.S. Space Force,” Reuters, February 19, 2019, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-military-space/trump-signs-directive-in-step-to-create-us-space-force-idUSKCN1Q82H2

[19]Marcia Smith, “Trump Orders Establishment of Unified Combatant U.S. Space Command,” SpacePolicyOnline.com, December 18, 2018, https://spacepolicyonline.com/news/trump-orders-establishment-of-unified-combatant-u-s-space-command/

[20]“Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering Dr. Michael D. Griffin biography,” U.S. Department of Defense, https://dod.defense.gov/About/Biographies/Biography-View/Article/1489249/michael-d-griffin/

[21]White House Fact Sheets, “President Donald J. Trump to Withdraw the United States from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty,” The White House, February 1, 2019 https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/president-donald-j-trump-withdraw-united-states-intermediate-range-nuclear-forces-inf-treaty/

[22]White House Remarks, “Remarks by President Trump at a Roundtable on the Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act (FIRRMA),” The White House, August 23, 2018, https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-trump-roundtable-foreign-investment-risk-review-modernization-act-firrma/

[23]Roberta Rampton, “Trump pulling U.S. out of U.N. arms treaty, heeding NRA,” Reuters, April 26, 2019, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-guns-nra-trump/trump-pulling-us-out-of-un-arms-treaty-heeding-nra-idUSKCN1S21RD

[24]United Nations Office For Disarmament Affairs, “Arms Trade Treaty,” United Nations, Entered Into Force 24 December 2014, https://www.un.org/disarmament/convarms/arms-trade-treaty-2/

[25]Theodore R. Bromund, “Obama’s UN speech reveals why Arms Trade Treaty is so dangerous,” Fox News, September 26, 2014, https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/obamas-un-speech-reveals-why-arms-trade-treaty-is-so-dangerous

[26]Anatoliy Golitsyn (Author) and Christopher Story (Editor), The Perestroika Deception(Cambridge, Edward Harle Limited, 1995), https://archive.org/stream/AnatoliyGolitsyn/Golitsyn-ThePerestroikaDeception-TheWorldsSlideTowardsTheSecondOctoberRevolution1995_djvu.txt

[27]Anatoliy Golitsyn (Author) and Christopher Story (Editor), The Perestroika Deception(Cambridge, Edward Harle Limited, 1995), https://archive.org/stream/AnatoliyGolitsyn/Golitsyn-ThePerestroikaDeception-TheWorldsSlideTowardsTheSecondOctoberRevolution1995_djvu.txt

[28]Geoff Ziezulewics, “Senator: Chinese buildup in South China Sea like ‘preparing for World War III,’ Navy Times, January 29, 2019, https://www.navytimes.com/news/your-navy/2019/01/29/senator-chinese-buildup-in-south-china-sea-like-preparing-for-world-war-iii/

[29]David Satter “100 Years of Communism — and 100 Million Dead,” Wall Street Journal, November 6, 2017, https://www.wsj.com/articles/100-years-of-communismand-100-million-dead-1510011810

[30]Damien Sharkov, “Russia’s Putin:  I’ve Always Liked Communist and Socialist ‘Ideas’,” Newsweek, January 25, 2016,https://www.newsweek.com/russias-putin-says-he-always-liked-communist-socialist-ideas-419289

[31]“Milley: Russia is No. 1 Threat to U.S.,” Association of the United States Army, November 2, 2015, https://www.ausa.org/news/milley-russia-no-1-threat-us

[32]Wesley Morgan, “Trump’s new favorite general,” Politico, December 8, 2018,https://www.politico.com/story/2018/12/08/trump-favorite-general-mark-milley-joint-chiefs-chairman-1052227

[33]Associated Press, “Trump picks Gen. Mark Milley as next top military adviser,” NBC News, December 8, 2018, https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/trump-picks-commander-gen-mark-milley-next-top-military-adviser-n945586

[34]Meghann Myers, “Milley: The war in Afghanistan is 17 years old, and now storm clouds are ‘on the horizon’,” Army Times, October 9, 2018, https://www.armytimes.com/news/your-army/2018/10/09/milley-the-war-in-afghanistan-is-17-years-old-and-now-storm-clouds-are-on-the-horizon/

[35]Dan Lamothe, “‘We will pay the butcher’s bill in blood’: General issues stern warning as he becomes Army chief,” The Washington Post, August 14, 2015, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp/2015/08/14/we-will-pay-the-butchers-bill-in-blood-general-issues-stern-warning-as-he-becomes-army-chief-of-staff/?utm_term=.9846f186d56f

[36]Anatoliy Golitsyn, New Lies for Old(London, The Bodley Head Ltd., 1984), https://archive.org/stream/GolitsynAnatoleTheNewLiesForOldOnes/Golitsyn-NewLiesForOld-TheCommunistStrategyOfDeceptionAndDisinformation1984_djvu.txt

[37]“Gulftainer and Prominvest to set up joint venture,” PortNews, September 22, 2010, http://portnews.ru/news/124336/

[38]Alan Jones and Mary Fanning, “What Could Possibly Go Wrong? Secret Deal Allows Company Tied To Saddam’s Nuclear Bomb Maker, Iran, and U.A.E. To Manage Key Florida Port Facility,” Center For Security Policy, December 23, 2016, https://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Port_Canaveral_Occasional_Paper_12-23-16.pdf

[39]Mary Fanning and Alan Jones, “The Perfect Storm:  Project Pelican’s Gulftainer, Russia’s Club-K, KGB’s Primakov, North Korea, and the Architects of the Islamic Bloc and the Iran Nuclear Deal,” Center for Security Policy, November 9, 2017, https://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/9-Nov-17-The-Perfect-Storm.pdf

[40]Alan Jones and Mary Fanning, “EXCLUSIVE: Obama/Clinton secret operation handed Port Canaveral cargo container terminal to brother/business partner of Saddam Hussein’s nuclear bomb mastermind; sub and space bases in danger,” 1776 Channel, September 22, 2016, https://www.1776channel.com/2016/09/22/us/obama-clinton-handed-port-canaveral-to-brother-of-saddam-husseins-nuclear-bomb-mastermind/

[41]Anita Barrett, Kennedy Space Center, “What is the ‘Range?’” NASA, October 18, 2009,https://www.nasa.gov/centers/kennedy/home/eastern_range.html

[42]Naval Systems “Club-K Container Missile System,” ROSOBORONEXPORT, http://roe.ru/eng/catalog/naval-systems/shipborne-weapons/klab-k/

[43]Concern Morinformsystem-Agat “Club-K Container Missile System,” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mbUU_9bOcnM

[44]“Policy Guidance Number 1 – Implementing Guidance For Personnel Identified on “Blacklist,” U.S. Department of Defense, Released under FOIA January 14, 2014, https://www.thetorturedatabase.org/document/policy-guidance-number-1-implementing-guidance-personnel-identified-blacklist

[45]“Captain Moonlight’s Notebook: Writs fly as Iraq oil firm fends off media,” The Independent, March 21, 1993, https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/captain-moonlights-notebook-writs-fly-as-iraq-oil-firm-fends-off-media-1499099.html

[46]Anna Nemptsova, “Vladimir Putin’s Old KGB Buddy Has Plans to Help Russia Survive Sanctions,” Daily Beast, April 27, 2018, https://www.thedailybeast.com/vladimir-putins-old-kgb-buddy-has-plans-to-help-russia-survive-sanctions

[47]Heidi Brown, “Igor Sechin: The Kremlin’s Oil Man,” Forbes, November 11, 2009, https://www.forbes.com/2009/11/09/igor-sechin-rosneft-leadership-power-09-oil.html#616a40476fa3

[48]Tim Ross and Steven Swinford, “WikiLeaks: BP boss Bob Dudley blamed new Rosneft partner Igor Sechin for ‘black’ plot against him,” The Telegraph, February 1, 2011, https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/wikileaks/8294082/WikiLeaks-BP-boss-Bob-Dudley-blamed-new-Rosneft-partner-Igor-Sechin-for-black-plot-against-him.html

[49]Mary Fanning and Alan Jones, “The Perfect Storm:  Project Pelican’s Gulftainer, Russia’s Club-K, KGB’s Primakov, North Korea, and the Architects of the Islamic Bloc and the Iran Nuclear Deal,” Center for Security Policy, November 9, 2017, https://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/9-Nov-17-The-Perfect-Storm.pdf

[50]Tamsin Carlisle, “Crescent Group to strengthen Russia ties on energy,” The National, February 16, 2011, https://www.thenational.ae/business/cresent-group-to-strengthen-russia-ties-on-energy-1.422218

[51]Mary Fanning and Alan Jones, “The Uranium One Deal Is a Clear and Present Danger to America,” Lifezette, March 27, 2018, https://www.lifezette.com/2018/03/the-uranium-one-deal-is-a-clear-and-present-danger-to-america/

[52]Paul Bedard, “Expert: Iran ships a dry run for later nuclear/EMP attack; humiliate Obama,” Washington Examiner,” February 14, 2014, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/expert-iran-ships-a-dry-run-for-later-nuclear-emp-attack-humiliate-obama

[53]Michael Stott, “Deadly new Russian weapon hides in shipping container,” Reuters, April 26, 2010, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-weapon/deadly-new-russian-weapon-hides-in-shipping-container-idUSTRE63P2XB20100426

[54]Mary Fanning and Alan Jones, “The Perfect Storm:  Project Pelican’s Gulftainer, Russia’s Club-K, KGB’s Primakov, North Korea, and the Architects of the Islamic Bloc and the Iran Nuclear Deal,” Center for Security Policy, November 9, 2017, https://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/9-Nov-17-The-Perfect-Storm.pdf

[55]“America’s Nuclear Triad,” U.S. Department of Defense, https://www.defense.gov/Experience/Americas-Nuclear-Triad/

[56]Peter Pry, “Add two more legs to our nuclear triad, or we’ll lose the next war,” The Hill, April 12, 2019, https://thehill.com/opinion/national-security/438161-add-two-more-legs-to-our-nuclear-triad-or-well-lose-the-next-war

[57]Mary Fanning and Alan Jones, “Russia’s Pearl Harbor 2.0 Asymmetrical War Plans, Gulftainer, Club-K, and EMP,” Center for Security Policy, October 24, 2018, https://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/2018/10/24/russias-pearl-harbor-2-0-asymmetrical-war-plans-gulftainer-club-k-and-emp/

[58]Bryan Bender and Jacqueline Klimas, “Space war is coming — and the U.S. is not ready,” Politico, April 6, 2018, https://www.politico.com/story/2018/04/06/outer-space-war-defense-russia-china-463067

[59]“WATCH LIVE: Senate Armed Services: ‘Proposal for U.S. Space Force’ — April 11, 2019,” CNBC Television,streamed live on April 11, 2019, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cb6O4FNlsaw

[60]“U.S. Space Force Proposal,” C-SPAN, April 11, 2019, https://www.c-span.org/video/?459575-1/pentagon-leadership-testifies-proposed-space-force

[61]“NASA’s Muslim Outreach,” Real Clear Politics, July 7, 2010, https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2010/07/07/nasas_muslim_outreach_106214.html

[62]Ion Mihai Pacepa, “I Should Know: Dems’ Intel Abuse Is Reminiscent of My Work for Ceausescu,” PJ Media, February 9, 2018, https://pjmedia.com/mihaipacepa/know-dems-intel-abuse-reminiscent-work-ceausescu/

[63]“Barack Obama microphone gaffe: ‘I’ll have more flexibility after election,’” The Telegraph, March 26, 2012, https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/barackobama/9167332/Barack-Obama-microphone-gaffe-Ill-have-more-flexibility-after-election.html

[64]“Open Mic Treason Night? Obama’s Secret Message to Russia,” PJ Media PJTV, March 27, 2012, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J80AlgEQNoI

[65]Josh Gerstein, “Obama announces new START treaty,” Politico, March 26, 2010, https://www.politico.com/story/2010/03/obama-announces-new-start-treaty-035081

[66]Jonathan Landay and David Rohde, “Exclusive: In call with Putin, Trump denounced Obama-era nuclear arms treaty – sources,” Reuters, February 9, 2017, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-putin-idUSKBN15O2A5

[67]Ken Dilanian, USA Today, “Obama scraps Bush missile-defense plan,” ABC News, September 18, 2009, https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/obama-scraps-bush-missile-defense-plan/story?id=8604357

[68]Hans M. Kristensen, “US Navy Instruction Confirms Retirement of Nuclear Tomahawk Cruise Missile,” Federation of American Scientists, March 18, 2013, https://fas.org/blogs/security/2013/03/tomahawk/

[69]Mary Fanning and Alan Jones, “Representative Duncan Hunter to Trump: Gulftainer Port of Wilmington Deal Requires CFIUS National Security Review,” Center for Security Policy, April 27, 2018, https://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/2018/04/17/representative-duncan-hunter-to-trump-gulftainer-port-of-wilmington-deal-requires-cfius-national-security-review/

[70]“Remarks by the President on the Economy — Wilmington, DE,” The White House President Barack Obama, July 17, 2014, https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2014/07/17/remarks-president-economy-wilmington-de

[71]Editorial, “Obama’s Curious Purge Of The Military Continues,” Investor’s Business Daily, October 15, 2013, https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/obama-fires-two-nuclear-military-commanders/

[72]“Remarks by the President on the Economy — Wilmington, DE,” The White House President Barack Obama, July 17, 2014, https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2014/07/17/remarks-president-economy-wilmington-de

[73]“Exclusive: U.S. Treasury Secretary on his first Middle East visit,” Al Arabiya, June 17, 2014, http://english.alarabiya.net/en/webtv/reports/2014/06/17/Exclusive-interview.html

[74]Tom de Castella, “How did we forget about mutually assured destruction?,” BBC News Magazine, February 15, 2012, https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-17026538

[75]Henry S. Rowen, “Introduction,” in Getting MAD: Nuclear Mutual Assured Destruction, Its Origins and Practice,”  ed. Henry D. Sokolski (Carlisle Barracks, Nonproliferation Policy Education Center in cooperation with the Army War College Strategic Studies Institute, 2004), 2, https://ssi.armywarcollege.edu/pdffiles/PUB585.pdf

[76]“Chinagate,” W. L. MENG, et al. Plaintiffs, vs. BERNARD L. SCHWARTZ and LORAL SPACE AND COMMUNICATIONS, LTD., et al. Defendants, docket, Judicial Watch, February 2, 2012, https://www.judicialwatch.org/cases/chinagate/

[77]Alan Jones and Mary Fanning, “WikiLeaks Email Ties Apparent Clinton Pay-To-Play to Port Canaveral Deal with Family of Saddam Hussein’s Nuclear Mastermind,” Breitbart News Network, November 7, 2016, https://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2016/11/07/wikileaks-email-ties-apparent-clinton-pay-play-port-canaveral-deal-family-saddam-husseins-nuclear-mastermind/

[78]Matthew Vadum, “Flashback:  Bill Clinton gave China missile technology,” FrontPage Magazine, December 21, 2016, https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/265200/flashback-bill-clinton-gave-china-missile-matthew-vadum

[79]Mary Fanning and Alan Jones, “Jafars’ Abraaj Group Paid Clinton Foundation; Jafars rewarded with Port Canaveral Gulftainer Deal,” The American Report, October 6, 2016, http://theamericanreport.org/2016/10/06/jafars-abraaj-group-pays-clinton-foundation-jafars-awarded-port-canaveral/

[80]“US made $1.7 billion transfer to Iran in foreign cash, Treasury says,” Fox News, September 7, 2016, https://www.foxnews.com/politics/us-made-1-7-billion-transfer-to-iran-in-foreign-cash-treasury-says

[81]Adam Kredo, “Iran May Have Received as Much as $33.6 Billion in Cash, Gold Payments From U.S.,” The Washington Free Beacon, September 8, 2016, https://freebeacon.com/national-security/iran-may-received-much-33-6-billion-cash-gold-payments-u-s/

[82]Dr. Peter Vincent Pry, “Nuclear Iran — A World Crisis,” Arutz Sheva (Israel National News), March 15, 2018, http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Articles/Article.aspx/16643

[83]Maj. David Stuckenberg and Amb. R. James Woolsey and Col. Douglas DeMaio, Dr. Ernest Allan Rockwell, ed., Electromagnetic Defense Task Force 2018 Report, (Maxwell Air Force Base, Air University LeMay Center for Doctrine Development and Education, 2018), https://media.defense.gov/2018/Nov/28/2002067172/-1/-1/0/LP_0002_DEMAIO_ELECTROMAGNETIC_DEFENSE_TASK_FORCE.PDF

[84]Mary Fanning and Alan Jones, “The Perfect Storm:  Project Pelican’s Gulftainer, Russia’s Club-K, KGB’s Primakov, North Korea, and the Architects of the Islamic Bloc and the Iran Nuclear Deal,” Center for Security Policy, November 9, 2017, https://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/9-Nov-17-The-Perfect-Storm.pdf

[85]William R. Graham, “North Korea Nuclear EMP Attack: An Existential Threat,” 38 North, June 2, 2017, https://www.38north.org/2017/06/wgraham060217/?utm_source=38+North+Bulletin+060217&utm_campaign=38+North&utm_medium=email

[86]Associated Press, “Reagan Attacks Clinton Over Plan to Kill ‘Star Wars’ Program,” Los Angeles Times, May 16, 1993, https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1993-05-16-mn-36216-story.html

[87]William J. Broad, “What’s Next for ‘Star Wars’? ‘Brilliant Pebbles,’” The New York Times, April 25, 1989, https://www.nytimes.com/1989/04/25/science/what-s-next-for-star-wars-brilliant-pebbles.html

[88]Mary Fanning and Alan Jones, “SADDAM’S REVENGE: ASH CARTER, NLOS-LS, RUSSIA’S CLUB-K, IRAN, KGL, AND GULFTAINER AND HOW THEY CONVERGE TO PUT AMERICA IN MORTAL DANGER,” Center for Security Policy,” August 2, 2018, https://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/NLOS-LS_CLUB-K_08-02-18.pdf

[89]Mary Fanning and Alan Jones, “SADDAM’S REVENGE: ASH CARTER, NLOS-LS, RUSSIA’S CLUB-K, IRAN, KGL, AND GULFTAINER AND HOW THEY CONVERGE TO PUT AMERICA IN MORTAL DANGER,” Center for Security Policy,” August 2, 2018, https://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/NLOS-LS_CLUB-K_08-02-18.pdf

[90]Peter Vincent Pry, “Military options for denuclearizing North Korea,” The Washington Times,March 26, 2019, https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/mar/26/military-options-for-denuclearizing-north-korea/

[91]Peter Pry, “’Star Wars’ Defenses Like Brilliant Pebbles Are Necessary, Affordable,” Newsmax, April 9, 2018, https://www.newsmax.com/peterpry/brilliant-pebbles-star-wars-ronald-reagan-russia/2018/04/09/id/853492/

[92]Wright, Austin, “Carter’s no yes-man for Obama,” Politico, 12/02/2014.  https://www.politico.com/story/2014/12/ash-carter-record-113274

[93]Kim Holmes, “While Opposing Reagan’s SDI , Moscow Pushes Its Own Star Wars,” The Heritage Foundation, October 21, 1986, https://www.heritage.org/europe/report/while-opposing-reagans-sdi-moscow-pushes-its-own-star-wars

[94]“Transcript Of The President’s Commencement Address At U.S. Military Academy,” The New York Times, May 28, 1981, https://www.nytimes.com/1981/05/28/us/transcript-of-the-president-s-commencement-address-at-us-military-academy.html

[95]Peter Pry, “Finally, a presidential EMP order that may save American lives,” The Hill, March 28, 2019, https://thehill.com/opinion/national-security/436224-finally-a-presidential-emp-order-that-may-save-american-lives

[96]Peter Pry, “Build Star Wars Now — It’s The Law,” Newsmax, February 4, 2019, https://www.newsmax.com/peterpry/nuclear-attack-sdi-defense/2019/02/04/id/901188/

Christopher Holton Guest Hosts “Ringside Politics” Radio Show And Is Joined by Other CSP Experts on the Program

The Center’s VP for Outreach Christopher Holton guest hosted the “Ringside Politics” radio program and brought on guests including:

  • CSP Executive Chairman Frank Gaffney
  • CSP President Fred Fleitz
  • CSP VP for Government Relations J. Michael Waller
  • CSP VP of Analysis and Research Clare Lopez
  • CSP VP of Special Projects Tommy Waller
  • Col. Paul “Bubba D” Deckart
  • John Guandolo of Understanding The Threat

Click here to listen to the show

Grid Experts Decry EMP-Deniers’ Special Interest-Generated ‘Junk Science’


For Immediate Release
April 30, 2019

Hamilton Strategies, Media@HamiltonStrategies.com, Patrick Benner, 610.584.1096, ext. 104, or Deborah Hamilton, ext. 102

Grid Experts Decry EMP-Deniers’ Special Interest-Generated ‘Junk Science’

WASHINGTON—Today, what amounts to a lobbying arm of the utilities industry, the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) released a so-called “scientific study” that misleadingly and dangerously low-balls the threat posed to the U.S. electric “grid” from enemy-induced or naturally occurring electromagnetic pulses (EMP).

Fortunately, a number of America’s actual experts on the subject—including a former Director of Central Intelligence, experienced engineers and national security practitioners—have stepped forward to debunk the EPRI report as what has been accurately described as “junk science,” reminiscent of past tobacco industry-underwritten efforts to have putatively independent “scientists” disinform the public about the actual dangers of smoking.

This message was powerfully conveyed in a press conference held yesterday on the steps of the State Capitol of Alabama in Montgomery. The event was co-sponsored by the Save the Grid Coalition and the EMP Task Force on Homeland and National Security and moderated by Frank J. Gaffney, executive chairman of the Center for Security Policy, which sponsors the Coalition.

The press conference participants were welcomed by Lt. Gen. Steven Kwast, USAF, the host of a four-day meeting at Maxwell Air Force Base of the Electromagnetic Defense Task Force, which drew them and several hundred other leaders to address EMP and other electronic spectrum threats—and President Donald Trump’s executive order directing the military and relevant civilian agencies to mitigate them. The press conference speakers critiqued the EPRI study based on that organization’s previous, discrediting track-record of advocacy, rather than objective research, and on a sneak-preview of the document.

They were: former Clinton Director of Central Intelligence, R. James Woolsey; former staff director of the congressionally mandated EMP Threat Commission, Dr. Peter Vincent Pry; former Director of the Strategic Defense Initiative Organization, Amb. Henry Cooper; chairman of the Foundation for Resilient Societies, Thomas Popik; author and grid-down consultant, Jonathan Hollerman; executive director of the Alabama chapter of Eagle Forum, Becky Gerritson; and chairman of Eagle Forum’s Terrorism Committee, Commander Theresa Hubbard, USCG (Ret.).

Video of the press conference is available at www.SecuretheGrid.com, and its co-sponsors issued a statement offering several specific critiques of the defective EPRI report including, notably, its:

  • faulty assumptions about the amount of damage nuclear weapon-generated or severe solar storm-induced EMP would cause to transformers, SCADAS and other control systems;
  • reliance on computer modeling, unsupported by experimentation;
  • ignoring abundant data derived by the Pentagon, civilian agencies and government-sponsored studies, including much of it based on such experimentation; and
  • the ominous evidence that enemies of this country have doctrines and capabilitiesthat make EMP attacks anything but the “low-probability” threat that underpinned the EPRI report’s don’t-worry, be-happy effort to minimize it.

To interview a representative of the Secure the Grid Coalition, contact Deborah Hamilton, Media@HamiltonStrategies.com, 610.584.1096, ext. 102, or Patrick Benner, ext. 104.  


POTUS v. the Electromagnetic Pulse-Deniers

In June 2015, shortly before Donald Trump announced his candidacy for the presidency, he learned at an event we organized in Iowa that federal bureaucrats and electric utility executives were relentlessly impeding progress on protecting the nation’s most critical of critical infrastructures: our electric “grid.”  He was incredulous and expressed his determination, as president, to knock their heads together and secure the grid.

On March 26th, President Trump did just that – issuing an executive order directing action on countering specifically the threat posed to our grid and the society that utterly depends on it from enemy use of electromagnetic pulses or similar effects from intense solar storms.

Unfortunately, today electric industry obstructionists are unveiling a so-called study by their in-house think tank dismissing such threats. It will be used to defy the President.  He’s right; they’re wrong. Time to really knock heads.

Trump Rose To EMP Challenge, Now Must Fight DC Swamp

Originally published by Newsmax:

President Trump proves once again that he keeps his promises.

When candidate Trump began his race for president in the Iowa Republican caucuses, I briefed him that the greatest and least understood threat to our nation and global electronic civilization is electromagnetic pulse (EMP).

Candidate Trump, astonished that the U.S. government had done nothing to protect the national electric grid and other life-sustaining critical infrastructures, said, “Don’t worry. When I’m elected president, we’ll knock some heads together and fix this.”

Now President Donald Trump deserves the gratitude of every American for his new “Executive Order on Coordinating National Resilience to Electromagnetic Threats” signed on March 26, 2019.

It may well be the most significant executive order of any presidency.

And it does, in effect, “knock together the heads” of the Department of Energy (DOE), Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Department of Defense (DOD) and all other relevant U.S. government departments and agencies in a well-crafted masterplan to achieve national EMP preparedness.

The president’s executive order recognizes manmade and natural electromagnetic pulse (EMP) (from the high-altitude detonation of a nuclear weapon or from a solar superstorm) are existential threats to America and the world:

“An electromagnetic pulse (EMP) has the potential to disrupt, degrade, and damage technology and critical infrastructure systems. Human-made or naturally occurring EMPs can affect large geographic areas, disrupting elements critical to the Nation’s security and economic prosperity, and could adversely affect global commerce and stability.”

Crucially, after a quarter-century of warnings by scientists and experts, Mr. Trump is the first president to act decisively against the EMP threat: “The federal government must foster sustainable, efficient, and cost-effective approaches to improving the nation’s resilience to the effects of EMPs.”

The Congressional EMP Commission, officially the Commission to Assess the Threat from Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) Attack, has been warning for years that manmade or natural EMP could destroy our electronic civilization — killing millions — in reports published in 2004, 2008, and 2017. And before that, beginning in 1995, Congress held the first unclassified hearings sounding the alarm about the then little-known threat from EMP.

In 2008, Dr. William R. Graham, Chairman of the Congressional EMP Commission, testified that an EMP event causing a nationwide blackout lasting one year could kill up to 90 percent of Americans through starvation and societal chaos.

According to the July 2017 “EMP Commission Chairman’s Report” (available on Amazon.com):

“While during the Cold War major efforts were undertaken by the Department of Defense (DoD) to assure that the U.S. national command authority and U.S. strategic forces could survive and operate after an EMP attack, no major efforts were then thought necessary by the national leadership to protect critical national infrastructures, provided that nuclear deterrence was successful.

“With the development of small nuclear arsenals and long-range missiles by small, hostile, potentially irrational countries, including North Korea, the threat of a nuclear EMP attack against the U.S. becomes one of the few ways that such a country could inflict devastating damage to the U.S.”

The chairman’s report concludes, “Therefore, it is critical that the U.S. national leadership address the EMP threat as an immediate, existential issue, and give a high priority to assuring the necessary leadership is engaged and the necessary steps are taken to protect the country from EMP.”

President Trump’s EMP Executive Order seeks to realize the recommendations of the Congressional EMP Commission on a fast timeline, quickly.

It’s an excellent first step toward achieving national EMP preparedness.

Wisely, President Trump’s executive order puts the White House in charge of managing national EMP preparedness, as recommended by the EMP Commission and my book “EMP Manhattan Project” (Amazon.com).

DOE and DHS have been asleep at the wheel for years, doing little or nothing to protect the nation from EMP, so White House leadership on EMP preparedness is urgently necessary.

One of the smartest features of the EMP Executive Order requires that vulnerability of critical infrastructure vital equipment be established through empirical testing in EMP simulators.

DOE, the national labs, and their partners in the electric power industry, like the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI, really an industry lobby masquerading as an objective think tank), have done great injury to national security with junk science reports.

Accounts purportedly proving the national electric grid would be little damaged and quickly recovered from natural or nuclear EMP.

These studies rely on garbage-in-garbage-out computer models grossly underestimating EMP threats.

EPRI’s junk science is knowingly dishonest, since the EMP Commission met with their two EMP non-experts to try correcting their faulty analysis — to no avail.

EPRI’s happy face EMP reports are reminiscent of the cigarette industry’s untrustworthy “independent laboratory assessments,” allegedly proving there is no causal linkage between smoking and lung cancer.

Computer models are no substitute for EMP equipment testing, as last done comprehensively by the Congressional EMP Commission.

Now the battle to make America safe from EMP really begins.

President Trump must now penetrate the obfuscations of lobbyists, the lies of do nothing bureaucrats.

That is, he must keep knocking heads together to achieve the objectives of his excellent EMP Executive Order.

An Executive Order That Must Inspire a Paradigm Shift on EMP

This is Tommy Waller with the Secure The Grid Minute.

This week President Trump issued an Executive Order on Coordinating National Resilience to EMP. Until now, many in government and private industry have been rewarded for downplaying the threat from EMP and ridiculing those who warned about EMP as “unreasonable” or “apocalyptic.”

This Executive Order builds upon the research of the Free World’s most credible experts – the Congressional EMP Commission – and directs the U.S. Government to take the threat seriously.

Naysayers should be put on notice.  The paradigm has shifted.

Not only does America’s survival depend on those in Government addressing EMP, but now so does their career progression. Let’s pray our civil servants will embrace this sea change and waste no time executing the orders of the Commander in Chief!

Learn more at www.SecureTheGrid.com

North Korea’s Satellites Could Unleash Electromagnetic Pulse Attack

Originally published by Newsmax:

North Korea reportedly is rebuilding its Sohae satellite launch facility, widely interpreted as threatening to resume intercontinental missile development — ignoring the greater immediate threat from North Korea’s satellites and electromagnetic pulse (EMP) attack.

Dr. William Graham, EMP Commission Chairman, in “North Korea Nuclear EMP Attack: An Existential Threat,” on Oct. 12, 2017, warned Congress:

“While most analysts are fixated on when in the future North Korea will develop highly reliable intercontinental missiles, guidance systems, and reentry vehicles capable of striking a U.S. city, the threat here and now from EMP is largely ignored. EMP attack does not require an accurate guidance system because the area of effect, having a radius of hundreds or thousands of kilometers, is so large.

“No reentry vehicle is needed because the warhead is detonated at high-altitude, above the atmosphere. Missile reliability matters little because only one missile has to work to make an EMP attack against an entire nation.”

Moreover: ” . . . an EMP attack might be made by a North Korean satellite, right now. A Super-EMP weapon could be relatively small and lightweight, and could fit inside North Korea’s Kwangmyongsong-3 (KMS-3) and Kwangmyongsong-4 (KMS-4) satellites. These two satellites presently orbit over the United States . . . The south polar trajectory of KMS-3 and KMS-4 evades U.S. Ballistic Missile Early Warning Radars and National Missile Defenses, resembling a Russian secret weapon developed during the Cold War, called the Fractional Orbital Bombardment System (FOBS) that would have used a nuclear-armed satellite to make a surprise EMP attack on the United States.”

The Congressional EMP Commission Chairman’s Report (available from Amazon.com) in “Are North Korea’s Satellites An EMP Threat?” answers affirmatively, noting technology transfer from Russia to North Korea of Super-EMP weapon technology:

“They said North Korea could test a Super-EMP weapon ‘in a few years.’ The 2006 and subsequent low-yield tests do not appear to have been failures because North Korea proceeded with weaponization.

“In 1997, Andrey Kokoshin, then Russia’s First Deputy Defense Minister, stated Russia was deploying a new generation of advanced nuclear weapons ‘that have no counterparts in the world’ including EMP weapons and ‘ultra-small warheads weighing less than 90 kilograms.’ Such weapons would be small enough for North Korea’s satellites.”

Ambassador Henry Cooper, former Director of the U.S. Strategic Defense Initiative, and a preeminent expert on missile defenses and space weapons, has written numerous articles warning about the potential North Korean EMP threat from their satellites:

North Korea…could use its demonstrated satellite launcher to carry a nuclear weapon over the South Polar region and detonate it . . . over the United States to create a high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) . . . The result could be to shut down the U.S. electric power grid for an indefinite period, leading to the death within a year of up to 90 percent of all Americans — as the EMP Commission testified over eight years ago. (Sept. 20, 2016)

Former NASA rocket scientist James Oberg visited North Korea’s Sohae space launch base, witnessed elaborate measures undertaken to conceal space launch payloads, and in a 2017 article warned North Korea’s satellites pose an EMP threat.

North Korea tells the world its satellites are for peaceful scientific research. But the Sohae satellite launch facility is run by North Korea’s military, subordinate to their strategic rocket forces. Sohae during the 2013 crisis over Pyongyang’s third illegal nuclear test was “mobilized” along with other strategic missile forces.

North Korea acts as if its satellites are their greatest military asset. In 2016, amidst threats to make nuclear strikes and punish the U.S. for economic sanctions, North Korea launched their KSM-4 satellite.

In 2017, Kim Jong-un threatened to reduce the United States to “ashes” with “nuclear thunderbolts” and threatened to retaliate for U.S. economic sanctions and military pressure by “ordering officials and scientists to complete preparations for a satellite launch as soon as possible.”

North Korean press asserts readiness for “any form of war” and includes their satellite with “strengthening of the nuclear deterrent and legitimate artificial satellite launch, which are our fair and square self-defensive choice.”

Moreover, “The nuclear [weapons] we possess are, precisely, the country’s sovereignty, right to live, and dignity. Our satellite that cleaves through space is the proud sign that unfolds the future of the most powerful state in the world.” North Korea makes “constant preparations so that we can fire the nuclear warheads, which have been deployed for actual warfare for the sake of national defense, at any moment!”

In September of 2017, North Korea apparently tested an H-Bomb they described as capable of “super-powerful EMP attack” and published a technical report accurately describing Super-EMP weapons.

Yet on Feb. 27, 2019, in a hearing before the Senate Homeland Security Committee, Brian Harrell, Department of Homeland Security’s director for infrastructure security, asserted: “The [intelligence community] currently has no specific, credible information indicating there is an imminent threat to critical infrastructure from an EMP attack.”

Senate Homeland Security Chairman Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., to his great credit, said he’ll push for mandatory federal regulations protecting the nation’s electrical infrastructures from EMP.

Mr. President, drain the swamp in your intelligence community, help Senator Johnson, and send Kim Jong-un a message by shooting down his satellites!

Dr. Peter Vincent Pry is executive director of the Task Force on National and Homeland Security. He served on the Congressional EMP Commission as chief of staff, the Congressional Strategic Posture Commission, the House Armed Services Committee, and the CIA. He is author of “Blackout Wars.” For more of his reports, Go Here Now.